West Lombok Government; Jln.Sukarno-Hatta No 1, 83361, Gerung, Indonesia. Completed Master in Public Administration (Policy) at Flinders University, South Australia in August 2019.
Abstract: Energy policy in Indonesia has relatively not supported the efforts to cope with climate change. The amount of carbon-dioxide (CO2) increased by the use of coal, oil and natural gases. Indonesia with poupulation more than 260 million needs much amount of electricity supply. While most of the energy source is from fossil fuels sources such as coal, oil, and gas, the need for energy increases gradually. However, the reliability of the electricity supply is questionable with many protests due to rolling blackouts. One of the most promising alternatives to cope with energy demands and greenhouse gas emission is by developing nuclear power plants. Ironically, although Indonesia has planned to develop nuclear power since 1950s, it has not been really developed till nowadays for some reasons. This research by using a qualitative approach and based on data taken from books, e-books, journal articles, and governments’ documents aims to analyze the need for building nuclear energy in Indonesia. This research has four findings and suggestions: (1) nuclear power is the best option for Indonesia because it is safe, can meet energy demands, and economical; (2) nuclear power is the best option to mitigate and adapt global warming as suggested by Giddens and eco-modernists since it is environmentally friendly; (3) while the fear of lay people towards nuclear power development is the true fear because of unknowingness, the educated opponents and political elites are “playing the politics of fear” to bring pessimistic and despair; and (4) the Government of Indonesia should not hesitate to make policy to develop nuclear power because it has been widely supported by Indonesian public.
Keywords: nuclear power, climate change, eco-modernist, politics of fear.
Pages: 155 – 170 | Full PDF Paper